Charts of the Day - Why top-down Macro remains more important than ever

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams, American president

While we recently indicated our concerns relating to the relationship between rising positive correlations thanks to central banks' markets meddling and rising +/-4 standard deviations moves or more in asset classes in our August short conversation "Charts of the Day - Positive correlations and large Standard Deviation moves", we believe that top-down Macro remains more important than ever thanks to these rising correlations.

This can be ascertained from Bank of America Merrill Lynch's "Global Focus Point note from the 7th of September entitled "3 million data points soared":

"Correlations skyrocketed in August
In August, global stock-to-stock correlations jumped to the highest level in four years. Macro concerns ranging from fear of the Fed raising rates, China slowdown, risk of Greece contagion, and falling GDP forecasts have marred equity market returns recently. Stock-to-stock correlations are signaling that stocks are performing similarly to each other. Factoring in macro issues becomes much more important than pure fundamentals during phases of rising correlations.

3 million data points
Stock-to-stock (or pair-wise) correlation is correlation between daily price returns of each stock in the MSCI ACWI index to the daily price returns of every other stock (i.e., 3 million calculations each month). Last month correlations jumped above long-term averages in all major regions and sectors of the world. Correlations are highest in Japan, followed by Europe and the US. Previous jumps in correlations have coincided with falls in global equity markets, on average.

Signals from the Global Wave critical
Rising stock-to-stock correlation coupled with weakening Tactical Indicators suggests that macro is more important than ever. The Global Wave, our macro indicator, continues to fall after signaling a peak in the global economic cycle in January. Investors should closely monitor the signals from the Global Wave for clarity on the macro environment.

What to buy?History suggests defensive styles and sectors tend to do well when the Global Wave is falling. This suggests overweighting the Bunkers which are based on styles for a downturn including earnings stability, low beta, low estimate dispersion and high dividends.

The best performing sectors when the Global Wave is falling tend to be Health Care and Consumer Staples, and the worst include Materials and Industrials." - source Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Furthermore a low beta strategy of "overweighting sectors such as "Consumer Staples" can be seen as an embedded free "partial crash" put option.

We already approached this very subject in our 3rd of April 2013 conversation "Equities, playing defense - Consumer Staples, an embedded free "partial crash" put option":

"The value of the put option offered by the Consumer Staples sector protects investors from monthly declines of 5% or more i.e. you can generate market performance and be insulated to a degree from major market shocks." - source Société Générale

As per our previous April 2013 note:
Consumer Staples are mostly a defensive play that can outperform during phases of "Risk-Off" which we have been experiencing on numerous occasions since the financial crisis of 2008:

"The low-volatility index did best in times when stocks fell, such as 2000 to 2002, and in 2008, according to S&P data. In 2008 the low-volatility index fell 21 percent compared with 37 percent for the S&P 500." - source Bloomberg.

As a reminder, another way in protecting a portfolio is investing on ETFs such as the PowerShares S&P Low Volatility Portfolio for protection from stock-market swings because Consumer Staples account for around 22%.

Some inconvenient facts: Low volatility stocks have provided the best long-term returns, one of the greatest anomalies in finance.

 "Defense is a definite part of the game, and a great part of defense is learning to play it without fouling." - John Wooden, American coach

Stay tuned!

Credit - Livin' On The Edge

"There's somethin' wrong with the world today
I don't know what it is
Something's wrong with our eyes

We're seeing things in a different way
And God knows it ain't His
It sure ain't no surprise

We're livin' on the edge" - Aerosmith 1993, Livin On The Edge

While we contended this week about the complacency in US stocks, when looking at the "great rotation" between institutional investors and private clients for the last five consecutive weeks as reported by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, we thought this week we would use a musical reference for a change, namely 1993 hit song by Aerosmith, which reflected at the time the sorry state of the world.

In this week's conversation, while everyone is enjoying a summer break and some much needed normalization in credit spreads, which has seen cash credit tightened overall by 5 bps this week in the European market on the Iboxx Euro Corporate index, we would like to focus our attention on the growing disconnect between asset prices and the sorry state of the real economy.

Indeed we would have to agree with our chosen title when looking how the US stock market has been defying gravity compared to the sorry state of the US labor market. There has been a growing disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. On that note we agree with Bank of America Merrill Lynch's report from the 1st of August entitled "When Worlds Collide":

"From their 2009 lows the US economy has grown by $1.3 trillion while the US stock market has grown by $12.0 trillion (in July the S&P 500 set a new intraday high). Policy, positioning and profits (in that order) best explain the seeming disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. Wall Street and capitalists have enjoyed a boom, as the price of equities and bonds (and more recently real estate) have soared, while Main Street and the labor market have struggled" 

- source Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Yes recently we did indicate, "we're livin on the edge", when  not only looking at the rise of the S&P index (blue) versus NYSE Margin debt (red) but also at the S&P EBITDA growth (yellow) and as well as the S&P buyback  index (green) since 2009 - graph source Bloomberg:

No doubt to us that the current bull market which has started in March 2009 has been artificially "boosted" by "de-equitization", namely the reduction of the number of shares courtesy of buybacks. A drop in stock outstanding accounted for 25% of 2012 earnings-per-share growth in the S&P 500. Buybacks are a global phenomenon.

Capital, courtesy of ZIRP, is not only mis-allocated but also destroyed with the "de-equitization" process in order to boost even more the "infamous" wealth effect induced rally by Mr Ben Bernanke. As far as profits are concerned, companies as sitting on record amount of cash and have generated record corporate profits as indicated by Bank of America Merrill Lynch's graph below:

"Profits: corporate austerity since the Great Financial Crisis has induced record corporate profits ($1.6 trillion – Chart 3) and record levels of corporate cash ($1.2 trillion), an asset-positive, growth-negative combo." - source Bank of America Merrill Lynch

While the latest ISM / PMI releases point to some much hoped economic recovery, the latest disappointing read of the Nonfarm payroll coming at 162 K shows how much the recovery has been tepid so far whereas equities have continued their surge undisturbed.

US PMI versus Europe PMI from 2008 onwards. Graph - source Bloomberg:

But if short term wise economic data shows some sign of stabilization, the volatility in the fixed income space is very much present as displayed by Merrill Lynch's MOVE index jumping from early May from 48 bps and surging back towards the 100 bps level - graph source Bloomberg:

MOVE index = ML Yield curve weighted index of the normalized implied volatility on 1 month Treasury options.

CVIX index = DB currency implied volatility index: 3 month implied volatility of 9 major currency pairs.

What we have been tracking with interest is the ratio between the ML MOVE index and the VIX which remains elevated from an historical point of view if we look back since October 2000 - graph source Bloomberg:

This latest surge in fixed income volatility has put some renewed pressure on Investment Grade as indicated by the price action in the most liquid US investment grade ETF LQD and High Yield, as displayed by the lost liquid ETF HYG - source Bloomberg:

If the fixed income space, the goldilocks period of “low rates volatility / stable carry trade environment” of these last couple of years seems to have been seriously tested, yet there remain a big disconnect between equities and fixed income. As we posited in our conversation on the 13th of June "The end of the goldilocks period of low rates volatility / stable carry trade environment?":

"The huge rally in risky assets has been similar to the move we had seen in early 2012, either, we are in for a repricing of bond risk as in 2010, or we are at risk of repricing in the equities space."

For now volatility indicators in both Europe (V2X) and the US (VIX) have been fairly muted. Graph source Bloomberg:

So the big question is indeed are we indeed "Livin' On The Edge"? Here is what Bank of America Merrill Lynch posited in their 1st of August note on this subject:

"United we fall, divided we rise

Secular bears of financial assets will argue, with some justification that the worlds of Wall Street & Main Street cannot diverge indefinitely. This may well be so. But in the past 5 years this view has repeatedly missed the point that a divided world of High Liquidity & Low Growth has been the foundation of a ferocious bull market in financial assets.

And of course not all asset prices have reflated as nonchalantly and aggressively as US corporate stocks and credit. Commodity markets and the performance of global cyclicals versus defensives continue to point to a very, very subdued global growth environment. A breakdown in the Continuous Commodity Index (CCI –Chart 4) below 500 in coming weeks would discourage global growth upgrades (and stymie the recent rebound in Emerging Markets). 

It is very rare to see such outperformance of defensive stocks (up 26% over the past two years) versus cyclical stocks (down 4%) in a non-recessionary world (Chart 5).

- source Bank of America Merrill Lynch

As we argued back in April this year in our conversation "Equities, playing defense - Consumer staples, an embedded free "partial crash" put option", the downward protection from Consumer Staples can be illustrated from the following Bloomberg graph highlighting the performance of Consumer Staples versus Consumer Discretionary and Financials since October 2007 until October 2012:

Another "great anomaly" has been that low volatility stocks have provided the best long-term returns.

So yes indeed in, we do live, in an ambiguous world where low volatility provides the best returns, and with a great disconnect between equities and the real economy, with fixed income and equities. We think we are "Livin' On The Edge" and as indicated by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, but, we are not too far from "The Moment of Truth":

"Perhaps the best example of this bi-polar world is the fact that the US equity market now represents almost 50% of the world’s market cap. Despite limited support from the US dollar, US equities relative to EAFE are close to relative levels not seen since the 1960s (Chart 6), as investor positioning reflects belief in ongoing US market and macro leadership.

So moment of truth for the economy will arrive in the second half of this year. If ever the US were finally to achieve “escape velocity” it must be now. Significant monetary stimulus, the end of fiscal austerity, a booming housing market, a cheap dollar, and record corporate cash balances mean the US economy should meaningfully accelerate in coming quarters. Our own Ethan Harris looks for 2.0% GDP growth in Q3, 2.5% in Q4 and 2.7% in 2014.

Our investment strategy remains predicated on that outcome. In coming quarters we expect PMI’s to accelerate, job growth and bank lending to improve, higher interest rates to coincide with higher bank stock prices, and US dollar appreciation. We favor assets (such as financial stocks) and markets (such as Europe) that have lagged in the “High Liquidity-Low Growth” world of recent years." - source Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Unfortunately we do not share Bank of America Merrill Lynch's optimism on the acceleration of USD GDP growth in the coming quarters. For us, it is still muddle-through with significant risk on the downside.

US labor growth remains very weak as indicated in the below Thomson Reuters Datastream / Fathom Consulting graph:

QE and the law of diminishing returns - US QE in practice - Payrolls and Manufacturing ISM, graph source Thomson Reuters Datastream / Fathom Consulting:

In addition to this the regular economic activity and deflationary indicator we have been tracking has been Air Cargo. It is according to Nomura a leading indicator of chemical volume growth and economic activity:

"Our air cargo indicator of industrial activity came in at -3.8% (y-o-y) in June, following -4.8% in May and -7.4% in April. As a readily-available barometer of global chemicals activity, air cargo volume growth is a useful indicator for chemicals volume growth.

Over the past 13 years’ monthly data, there has been an 83% correlation between air cargo volume growth and global industrial production (IP) growth, with an air cargo lead of one to two months (Fig. 2). In turn, this has translated into a clear relationship between air cargo and chemical industry volume growth (Fig. 1).

- source Nomura

On a final note, if you think that stocks are "Livin' On The Edge" and that a QE tapering is around the corner, then maybe you ought to think about US Treasuries again, for a very simple reason, government bonds are always correlated to nominal GDP growth, regardless if you look at it using "old GDP data" or "new GDP data". In fact the case for treasuries is also indicated in Bloomberg's recent Chart of the Day:

Investors should buy Treasuries if they anticipate the Federal Reserve will reduce its purchases, based on the last two times that the biggest buyer of bonds stepped back from the market.

The CHART OF THE DAY shows the benchmark 10-year yield dropped and gains in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index slowed after the Fed ended each of the prior two rounds of quantitative easing in the past four years. The yield declined 1.26 percentage points between the end of the first round of Fed purchases in March 2010 and the beginning of the second round in November that year. The U.S. stock gauge rose 2.4 percent, compared with a 36 percent advance during QE1.

The yield slid 1.3 percentage points between the end of the second round in June 2011 and the beginning of Operation Twist in September the same year. The S&P 500 fell 12 percent after gaining 10 percent during QE2.

“The Fed will taper QE not because the economy is booming but because the program has been creating excess liquidity, boosting risk assets too much,” said Akira Takei, the head of the international fixed-income department at Mizuho Asset Management Co., which oversees $37 billion and whose U.S. affiliate is one of 21 primary dealers that underwrite U.S. debt. “Ending QE is likely to trigger a correction in risk assets, driving bond yields down.”

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said on June 19 that the U.S. central bank may slow the third round of bond-buying, valued at $85 billion a month, later this year and end it entirely in the middle of 2014 if the economy achieves sustainable growth. Half of the 54 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News said the Federal Open Market Committee will decide to start taking such steps at its September meeting.

Futures traders see an almost 60 percent chance the Fed will keep the benchmark rate at a record-low range of zero to 0.25 percent through to at least the end of 2014. The 10-year Treasury yield is likely to fall to 1 percent by the end of March and may touch 0.8 percent next year, Mizuho’s Takei forecast. It was at 2.71 percent yesterday, up from 1.72 percent when QE3 was announced on Sept. 13 last year." - source Bloomberg.

Looks to us that the S&P 500 is no doubt "Livin' On The Edge".

Oh well...

"To him that waits all things reveal themselves, provided that he has the courage not to deny, in the darkness, what he has seen in the light." - Coventry Patmore, English poet.

Stay tuned!

Equities - Defensive versus Cyclicals, a volatility update

"Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character." - John Wooden 

Following the rise in volatility in May leading to a strong sectorial rotation, please find below an update on the derivatives markets for 4 emblematic sectors:

-ETFs Healthcare and Consumer Staples for the "defensive" sector (XLV & XLP)

-ETFs Consumer Discretionary and Industrials for cyclicals (XLY & XLI)

Chart 1 : Volatiliies 1 year ATM (At The Money) for XLV & XLP versus XLI & XLY:

- chart source Bloomberg

Chart 2 : Spread Volatility 1 year ATM XLI (Industrials) vs XLV (Healthcare) - source Bloomberg:

One conclusion can be reached from the above is that spreads for long implied volatilities for  the cyclical sector as well as  the defensive sector have touched the lowest levels seen in the last couple of years.

Are the equities derivatives markets pricing correctly or incorrectly the end of the paradigm "min-variance / low-volatility " of the defensive sectors? 

The impact in terms of sectorial allocation based on historical VaR models could be significant should the convergence between historical/implicit volatilities of the sector continue its trend.

In Europe, there is a similar situation going on if you look at for example the volatility for a defensive index such as the SMI versus the volatility of a more cyclical index such as the German DAX.

Chart 3 : Spread 6 months at the money (ATM) volatility for the German DAX vs SMI, source Bloomberg:

Chart 4 : min-var sector valuation premiums (source Barclays):

"Premium for safe, low volatility sectors in Europe looks high. This level was last seen in March 2009 and June 2012". - source Barclays.

So, are implicit volatilities pricing correctly or incorrectly a shift in this paradigm? 

Or are the excess valuation premium anticipating a sudden surge in risk aversion which has not yet been seen yet in long-dated volatilities? We wonder...

"Isn't life a series of images that change as they repeat themselves?" - Andy Warhol 

Stay tuned!

Equities, playing defense - Consumer staples, an embedded free "partial crash" put option

"Defense is a definite part of the game, and a great part of defense is learning to play it without fouling." - John Wooden, American coach

In continuation to previous conversations discussing the relationship between equity versus credit we would like to point out the downward protection offered by Consumer Staples and its recent relationship with High Yield since the financial crisis of 2008/2009. We will also look at the "greatest anomaly" namely that you get superior long term returns from low volatility equities.

As indicated by a very interesting note from Societe Generale from the 26th of March from their Global Quantitative Research team entitled - Consumer Staples outperformance solely attributable to market crash protection where they indicated the following relationship with the high yield bond market:

"Over recent years, the Global Consumer Staple sector has performed more in line with the high yield bond market than the broader equity market – or indeed, the MSCI high dividend yield index. This market-beating performance has been attributed to the clamor for quality yield but we’re not convinced. Here we show that the outperformance was wholly driven, not by yield, but the ability to limit losses during periods of acute market weakness. Essentially, fund managers are not seeking yield but buying downside protection, and in a world where market shocks are more common, the resulting premium is perfectly understandable." - source Societe Generale

Consumer Staples, or how to play defense when capital preservation dominates performance:

"The chart below plots the performance of the Global Consumer Staples sector versus high yield bonds, high yield equity and the overall global equity market. As the chart shows, in recent years, whilst ‘high dividend yield’ has largely tracked the equity market, the Consumer Staples sector has more closely mirrored the high yield bond market. Not only are total returns similar, but drawdown (peak to trough losses) have also been around 35%." - source Societe Generale

"From the chart above it seems that the outperformance of high yield bonds and the Consumer Staples sector has been fairly consistent, but the relative performance versus MSCI World reveals that the bulk of outperformance came during the financial crisis of 2008/09 and the Eurozone crisis in the summer of 2011." -  source Societe Generale

"Capital preservation is a concept that many investors understand but perhaps underestimate. No doubt this is because major market declines tend to happen suddenly and on a relatively infrequent basis. This is also why market bears – as we know from experience – tend to look completely stupid most of the time. To demonstrate the importance of loss avoidance, we have taken the often quoted Consumer Staples sector as our example and we aim to demonstrate that the premium afforded to this sector and its outperformance in recent years is courtesy of downside protection." - source Societe Generale

On another note, Gary Shilling in a Bloomberg column on the 30th of January entitled - Where to Invest While Markets Remain "Risk On" also seems to favor Consumer Staples as part of an overall investment strategy:

"Consumer Staples and Food:

Items such as laundry detergent, bread and toothpaste are essentials that are purchased in good times and bad. Their producers’ equities will remain attractive. The Standard &Poor’s Consumer Staples Sector Index was up 10.8 percent last year, after a 14 percent gain in 2011. Among retailers of consumer staples, the winners may continue to be discounters, such as Family Dollar Stores Inc. U.S. used-merchandise stores have been thriving. Producers of national brands will need to continue to adapt to weak consumer incomes and high unemployment by emphasizing cheaper “value” products."

But moving back to the downside protection offered by Consumer Staples, Societe General offers some an interesting analysis on the downside premium offered by this sector:

"Firstly, we devise a strategy that invests mainly in Consumer Staples but we switch into the equity market rather than the staying in the sector during periods of major market declines. By doing this we effectively remove the drawdown protection from the sector by being totally invested in equities instead of lower-beta Consumer Staples during market pullbacks. 

So, with perfect foresight, we identify the months when the MSCI World index lost more than 3%. Then, rather than stay invested in Consumer Staples (as you should), we invested (mistakenly) in the equity market instead. The purpose here is to understand just how important capital preservation is in driving overall returns from the Consumer Staples sector versus the market by replacing the best months of relative performance with the market return. By investing in the market, and not the sector, during those periods when the market was down 3% or more effectively kills the outperformance of the sector, to the extent that the sector goes from outperforming by nearly 50% to underperforming by 20%. This in part starts to demonstrate just how important the downside protection is in driving the performance of this sector.

If we repeat the exercise but this time for a threshold of -5% or more (which happened 12% of the time), we find that the sector performs in-line with the market. This suggests to us that the value of the put option offered by the Consumer Staples sector protects investors from monthly declines of 5% or more i.e. you can generate market performance and be insulated to a degree from major market shocks." - source Societe Generale

"Let’s explain things a little differently. Imagine a strategy where one invested in the market most of the time but (with perfect foresight) switched into the Consumer Staples sector during months when the market fell by 3% or more. By comparing this strategy to the performance of Consumer Staples sector we can measure the protection being offered and, as we show below, see that this strategy outperforms the Consumer Staples sector, implying that the better performance of the sector is not sufficient to compensate the investor when markets decline by 3% or more. But what happens if we switch to investing in the sector during months when the market fell by 5% or more?

While our strategy invests in the market 88% of the time and in the sector just 12% of the time, its performance almost perfectly matches the overall performance of the Consumer Staples sector. Hence our assertion that the sector is primarily a market index with a put option attached, much in the same way we describe another quality measures such as Merton’s balance sheet model and Piotroski’s F-score." 

Societe Generale concluded their note with the following important point relating to the limitation of the protection offered by Consumer Staples:

"Of course the Consumer Staples sector does not fully protect the investor as it too can fall, but historically by only 60% of the market fall. Valuing our put option is difficult. But with the incidence of months when the market fell by 5% or more being twice as common in the last 15 years than in the previous 25 (see below), this put option has become more important to investors. As we have stated on numerous occasions, understanding drawdown risk and capital preservation qualities is paramount to understanding what an asset is worth. With the events in Cyprus still ringing in our ears, that has never been more relevant than today." - source Societe Generale

The downward protection from Consumer Staples can be illustrated from the following Bloomberg graph highlighting the performance of Consumer Staples versus Consumer Discretionary and Financials since October 2007 until October 2012:

Another way in protecting a portfolio is investing on ETFs such as the PowerShares S&P Low Volatility Portfolio for protection from stock-market swings as indicated by Charles Stein in his Bloomberg article from the 20th of March - ETF Beating Markets With Gains Less Price Swings:

"Investors who bought PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio for protection from stock-
market swings when it debuted almost two years ago got an unexpected bonus: They also made more money.
The $4.1 billion exchange-traded fund, which owns the 100 stocks in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index with the lowest volatility, gained 30 percent since its inception on May 5, 2011, compared with 21 percent for the benchmark U.S. index. The ETF, the largest of its kind, achieved that performance with about 70 percent of the volatility in the index, giving it a risk-adjusted return double that of the market, according to the BLOOMBERG RISKLESS RETURN RANKING." - source Bloomberg

Of course, no real surprise looking at the composition of the index detailed in the article and the "defensive theme" of its components:

"In the low-volatility index, utilities represented 31 percent of the portfolio, compared with 3.4 percent in the regular U.S. benchmark, and consumer staples accounted for 24 percent, versus the index’s 11 percent at the end of February, according data from Standard & Poor’s. Information technology, which represents 18 percent of the S&P 500, made up 3.6 percent of the low-volatility portfolio.
Among the biggest individual holdings in the PowerShares ETF are Johnson & Johnson and PepsiCo Inc., the two stocks in the S&P 500 with the lowest volatility over the past year --10.1 and 10.4, respectively. Johnson & Johnson, based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, advanced 21 percent in the 12 months ended March 15, and Purchase, New York-based PepsiCo climbed 18 percent." - source Bloomberg.

In terms of top contributors to the performance, in continuation to our "defensive them" the article indicated Consumer Staples as the top performers:

"The biggest contributor to the ETF’s performance over the past year include H.J. Heinz Co., the Pittsburgh-based ketchup maker being acquired by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and 3G Capital Inc., portfolio data compiled by Bloomberg show. Hershey Co., the Hershey, Pennsylvania-based candy company, was the second-biggest." - source Bloomberg

We indicated early in our conversation we would look at the "greatest anomaly" namely that low volatility stocks have provided the best long-term returns. In addition to Societe Generale's point on the defensive features of low-volatility stocks such as Consumer Staples, they also provide the best returns as indicated in the same Bloomberg article from Charles Stein:

“The long-term outperformance of low-risk portfolios is perhaps the greatest anomaly in finance,” Harvard Business School Professor Malcolm Baker wrote in a 2011 paper in Financial Analysts Journal.

When S&P designed the low-volatility product, it traced the history of the index back to 1990 in a process known as backtesting. The numbers showed that over three, five years and 10 years, the low-volatility index had a higher total return than the S&P 500.

Harvard’s Baker said market data going back to the 1930s show that low-volatility stocks have delivered about the same returns as market indexes, a result that contradicts the notion that higher risks translate to higher rewards. “In this case you are taking less risk, but not giving up any return,” he said in a telephone interview.

Investor Behavior

Other studies have come to similar conclusions, according to Joel Dickson, a senior investment strategist at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania-based Vanguard Group Inc., who said finance scholars have a hard time explaining the mismatch. Most theories attempting to explain it revolve around investor behavior.

Because people are overly smitten with fast-growing, glamorous companies, they bid up the prices of those stocks to the point where future returns suffer, said Dickson.

Dickson offers a caveat. When stocks soar as they did in the 1990s, low-volatility holdings can underperform for long stretches, said Dickson, a senior investment strategist at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania-based Vanguard Group Inc. “As an investor you have to be willing to stomach periods

when this strategy gets killed,” Dickson said in a telephone interview.

In the nine years ended Dec 31, 1999, a period in which stocks gained 21 percent a year, the S&P 500 Index returned more than twice as much as its low-volatility counterpart, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It also outperformed after accounting for price swings, with a risk-adjusted return of 32 percent, compared with 20 percent for the low-volatility index." - source Bloomberg

We therefore disagree with Gary Shilling, Consumer Staples are not purely a "Risk-On" strategy given that as indicated by Bloomberg:

"In the nine years ended Dec 31, 1999, a period in which stocks gained 21 percent a year, the S&P 500 Index returned more than twice as much as its low-volatility counterpart, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It also outperformed after accounting for price swings, with a risk-adjusted return of 32 percent, compared with 20 percent for the low-volatility index." - source Bloomberg

But, Consumer Staples are mostly a defensive play that can outperform during phases of "Risk-Off" which we have been experiencing on numerous occasions since the financial crisis of 2008:

"The low-volatility index did best in times when stocks fell, such as 2000 to 2002, and in 2008, according to S&P data. In 2008 the low-volatility index fell 21 percent compared with 37 percent for the S&P 500." - source Bloomberg.

On a final note, in relation to the differences between equity and as posited by our good friend Paul Buigues, Head of Research at Rcube Global Macro Research in his post "Long-Term Corporate Credit Returns":

"Equity is an infinite claim on the free cash flows generated by a company. Due to the inherent uncertainty of future cash flows, relying on a pure valuation framework to predict equity returns is often a disappointing experience, for both specific companies and equity as an asset class.

Corporate debt, on the other hand, is generally a finite claim on a predetermined stream of cash flows (coupons + principal repayment)."

Corporate credit is a much simpler bet than equity, especially for investors that hold credit instruments until maturity. For instance in High Yield as indicated by our friend Paul "initial spreads explain nearly half of 5yr forward returns" (even for a rolling investor (whose returns are also driven by mark-to-market spread moves). 

When it comes to yield the PowerShares ETF has a dividend yield of 2.78 percent compared to 2.13 for the S&P 500 Index, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, so could it be that after all Consumer Staples in  the equity space are a much more simpler bet, in similar fashion to corporate credit? One has to wonder...

"Right is its own defense." - Bertolt Brecht

Stay tuned!

Yogurts, European Consumer Confidence and Consumption

"Consumption may be regarded as negative production."
Alfred Marshall - Economist

Looking at European company Danone's profitability warning leading to a drop in the share price in conjunction with a dismal German investor confidence Zew index (ZEW institute reported that its monthly confidence index dropped by 27.7 points to a level of -16.9 points — its strongest decline since October 1998) has made us reflexionate around Yogurts, European Confidence level and Consumption.

Danone share price taking a beating - source Bloomberg:

As reported by Dermot Doherty in Bloomberg, Danone, the world's biggest yogurt maker cut its profitability forecast as Spanish consumers switch to less expensive products and raw-material costs rise, sending the shares down the most in three years - Danone Cuts Profitability Goal on Southern Europe, Costs:

"Danone is losing market share in dairy in Spain, where about one in four people are unemployed, and will take measures such as cutting costs and introducing new products to react. That will reduce profitability in southern Europe, Chief Financial Officer Pierre-Andre Terisse said today.

“The competitive environment in Spain is a lot tougher, so they’re having to invest more in promotion and pricing,” said Martin Dolan, head of equity research at Espirito Santo in London. “This is very Danone-specific rather than sector wide because of milk raw-material costs, and Danone’s exposure to Spain is far greater at about 8 percent than for other big food companies.”

Danone also indicated in relation to consumer spending in the same article:

"The French yogurt maker in April said it expected consumer spending to remain “under pressure” this year in western Europe. European companies are wrestling with the fallout from a drop in consumer spending as the sovereign debt crisis rocks the region’s economies. Carrefour SA, the biggest European retailer, last week said it would withdraw from Greece and carmaker Fiat SpA said it would cut investment in the region by 500 million euros ($630 million)."

In similar fashion to the trend in shipping with shipping giant Maersk is in fact shifting its business away from Europe (Shipping is a leading deflationary indicator) while Airlines are benefiting from growth outside Europe where traffic to the Americas have been the biggest beneficiary (Air Traffic is a leading deflationary indicator), Danone said sales growth target of 5-7% was unchanged; with robust performance in Asia, Americas, Africa, Middle-East, CIS offsetting pressure in Western Europe.

Leading us to an interesting exercise, plotting Danone share price against the gauge for consumer sentiment which last came at minus 19.3 (from minus 19.9) at the end of May 2012: Danone share price versus European Consumer Confidence since 2006 - source Bloomberg:

At the end of May Consumer Confidence in Europe fell to a two and half year low, following the previous inconclusive Greek elections, Spanish woes and fears of a euro break up.
Yogurts matter as an indicator? One has to wonder...

As austerity bites consumer spending and with Italy and Spain in recession, companies have been forced to lower cost to protect earnings so far. End of May the ECB also indicated that loans to households and companies in the euro zone grew at the slowest pace in two years as the on-going crisis curbed demand for credit.

We already discussed the difference between the growth differential between the USA and Europe (Growth divergence between US and Europe? It's the credit conditions stupid...), which continue to improve in the USA for now as indicated by my friends at Rcube Global Macro Research:
"The private sector credit growth (one of the most reliable Fed Fund leading indicator) has spiked(15% yoy).
The % of US commercial banks reporting stronger commercial & industrial loan demand is back to 2004 levels."

"As a result, US commercial banks will adjust balance sheets to the rising demand for loans, buying fewer Treasuries in the process. Their stock of government securities has risen from less than 10% of total assets in Q4 2009, to 15% today. While the incentive to do so was large over the last 4 years (extremely steep yield curve, falling inflation, broken credit channel), it is less so today. Their pace of purchase has already slowed from 25% YoY in Q3 2009 to less than 10% today, and should weaken further."
- source Rcube Global Macro Research - 18th of June 2012

As far as European Staples are concerned, according to a recent study by Morgan Stanley, impact of private consumption in Europe could be very significant in "European divorce" scenario playing out  - "European Consumer Testing Defensiveness – Downside Case Priced In?" - 14th of June 2012:
"Better prepared for an even worse scenario? In a “European divorce” scenario, the impact on private consumption in Europe could be worse than in 2009 due to the reduced scope for fiscal and monetary policy and higher unemployment. On the positive side, the Consumer Staples sector could see less of a relative de-rating because a) financial leverage is lower, b)inventory levels are generally at more manageable levels, c) commodity inflation is lower, and d) many companies have also expanded their lower-price point offerings. The relative re-rating has also been more measured this time, as the PE premium (60%) has not yet reached the peak from Nov 2009 (80%)."

It isn't only Danone facing similar exposure to weakening consumption levels in Western Europe with a slowdown in consumption levels in peripheral countries such as Spain. Heineken, L'Oreal, Reckitt and others are also exposed to similar trends as indicated by Morgan Stanley in their recent note:

"Within the region, Southern Europe only accounts for less than 10% of group sales on average across the sector. Imperial Tobacco is the most exposed to the region (Spain accounts for around 2/3 of its sales in Southern Western Europe). It is followed by Diageo and Heineken with more than 15% of group sales in the region (mostly Ireland and Spain for Diageo, and mainly Spain and Italy for Heineken). In Food, Danone has the largest exposure to Southern Europe, as Spain (~14% of group EBIT) is its most profitable market." - source Morgan Stanley - "European Consumer Testing Defensiveness – Downside Case Priced In?" - 14th of June 2012

No surprise Morgan Stanley's conclusion:
"Mix is Key
Our Bear case analysis illustrates the importance of having diversified portfolios and geographic exposures. Geographic mix (which we define as higher-margin regions growing faster than the group average and vice versa for lower-margin regions) plays a crucial role in determining the magnitude of downside risk in our Bear case scenarios."

In regards to European Consumption trends, CreditSights in their recent Euro Consumer Takeaways from the 18th of June made the following interesting points:
"-Italy: Confidence has fallen to its lowest level ever as of May; minus 38.6. Spending had already fallen by 2.4% in the 12 months to the first quarter, which is as large as the fall in the 2009 recession. Consumer spending can only fall so far before households fall back on subsistence levels, and prolonged declines in spending are rare. As such they believe that full-year spending decline will be less negative than the 2.4% fall in the year to the first quarter, but we are still expecting to be at least 1% lower over 2012 as a whole in real terms.
-Households debts in France, Germany and Italy are much lower versus national income; compared to the UK (96% down from 103% of GDP in 2009); respectively 55%, 60% and 45% of those country’s annual GDP. Household debt-to-GDP for the Eurozone as a whole is 65%. But while households in France, Germany and Italy are less encumbered by debts and do not, therefore, have to divert income to servicing that debt, low interest rates should still act as some motivation to bring forward spending by borrowing. They believe that is especially the case of borrowing costs are barely any more than households expect their salaries to grow by.
-Consumer borrowing costs , adjusted for wages, in Germany are roughly in line with the crisis low in 2007 at 2%. However, at 4% in France and 6% in Italy, the interest rates on unsecured debts are well above the lowest rates they reached in the 2000s. Additionally, these lower real borrowing costs have not obviously generated greater increases in household debts.

Wealth holdings – the “housing” conundrum:
"In the UK most peoples’ primary provisioning for retirement is their house, that tends to mean that changes in house prices are closely associated with changes in spending. Therefore the stabilisation in UK house prices is good in that falls are not actively undermining spending any more, but in their view it will be a long time before rampant house price appreciation once again drives a boom in consumer spending.
In Germany and France, house prices have, since 2009, been growing strongly. Prices were not over-inflated by a bubble in mortgage lending in the pre-recession years. And to some extent that growth may feed through to a greater willingness to spend in those countries. But their UK contemporaries and so while booming prices in Germany may provide some inclination to spend less, they believe that more consistent income growth and falling unemployment (leading to greater job security and consumer confidence) will be more important drivers of any increases in household spending.
In contrast to France and Germany, Italian house prices have been falling for some time. And falling incomes, tax-induced increases in prices, rising unemployment and worries about the government’s fiscal position are all likely to ensure that spending by Italian households remain depressed with or without the additional impact of house price declines."

UK wise:
"The government’s attempt to tighten its belts at the same time as the private sector is also cutting spending will not only be self-defeating for the government’s fiscal position but is prolonging the period that it takes UK consumers to reduces their debts and feel confident once again about the outlook for their incomes. They expect UK household spending to be centered around the 0% range this year."

With consumer confidence and investor confidence in the doldrums, in conjunction with struggling Southern Europe no wonder yogurts are taking a beating...

"The shelf life of the average trade book is somewhere between milk and yogurt."
Calvin Trillin

Stay tuned!